Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L’Église orthodoxe traverse, ou paraît traverser, des difficultés dans ses rapports avec le Conseil œcuménique des Églises (COE). En réalité, ces difficultés prolongent un malaise déjà exprimé lors de la 6 e Assemblée du COE qui s’est tenue à Vancouver en 1983. Ses représentants dénoncèrent alors le risque de voir ce Conseil devenir un simple forum d’échange d’idées sans fondement théologique spécifiquement chrétien et où « une prière commune deviendrait de plus en plus difficile et en fin de compte impossible ». À ces difficultés d’ordre théologique s’ajoutent les difficultés spécifiques, notamment pour l’Église de Russie. Malgré cela, l’Église orthodoxe, à travers notamment le document adopté lors du Concile jubilaire d’août 2000, tient « que la recherche de l’unité est un élément essentiel de notre existence chrétienne ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".