MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1938065964

The Monetary Legal Theory Under the Talmud

2008· article· en· W1938065964 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Geva

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObject (grammar)Medium of exchangeTalmudValue (mathematics)ObligationPaymentCurrencyDebtIntrinsic value (animal ethics)EconomicsLaw and economicsBusinessLawPolitical scienceMonetary economicsPhilosophyFinanceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two fundamental principles of modern legal theory of money are nominalism and currency. Both refer to the object passing as money, and its use in payment of debts. Under the former, this object circulates and is tendered in the value of prescribed abstract units of account, as defined by law from time to time, regardless of its own intrinsic value, or even the obligation to redeem it at something of that intrinsic value. Under the latter, this object passes from hand to hand in circulation free from adverse claims of prior owners. A third principle, existing side by side with the two enumerated above, is the issue of the object under the authority of a state and its acceptance by the public at large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)Same topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207