Conflicto por el agua: un análisis geopolítico al sistema Tigris-Éufrates. 1990-2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El interes de este estudio de caso es analizar la situacion vivida entre los Estados de la cuenca del Sistema Tigris-Eufrates, un recurso hidrico transfronterizo entre 1990 y el 2003. Se estudia y explica como el Interes Nacional de Turquia, Siria e Irak, Estados riberenos del Sistema supuso un obstaculo para la implementacion de la Gestion Integrada de Recursos Hidricos sobre la cuenca, al impedir la cooperacion y coordinacion de las politicas gubernamentales, dificultando la proteccion de la cuenca y la garantia del acceso al recurso de forma equitativa. Este trabajo se enmarca en los estudios sobre Seguridad Ambiental, particularmente en la teoria de la Escasez Ambiental de Thomas Homer-Dixon y el Grupo de Toronto, referente a la relacion entre la escasez de un recurso natural renovable y el surgimiento de un conflicto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".