MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Germania de Tácito: tradução e comentários

2011· dissertation· pt· W1938468489 on OpenAlexaff
Maria C. A. L. S. de Andrade Andrade

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth PEI
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortugueseHumanitiesArtPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta dissertação apresenta versão para o vernáculo do texto latino de Germania, obra trazida a lume em 98 d. C. pelo historiador Tácito e que compõe o conjunto das opera minora desse autor.Tal tradução é acompanhada do texto em latim e de notas para justificar determinada opção de versão, ante outras possibilidades de leitura da mesma palavra/passagem.A seguir, são tecidos comentários sobre a composição genérica de Germania, verificando as características que permitem inseri-la na tradição etnográfica e periegética e o contato com outros gêneros literários, mas também sobre a debatida questão da interpretação dessa obra única na literatura romana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207