MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Call for Freedom: Aime Cesaire’s A Tempest

2010· article· en· W1938928115 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fei Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTempestHumanitiesArtColonialismLiteratureEthnologyArt historyPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A postcolonial adaptation of Shakespeare’s The Tempest, African poet Aime Cesaire’s play A Tempest overtly conveys his anti-colonism, exploring the relationship between Prospero the colonizer and his colonial subjects Caliban and Ariel from the perspective of the colonized. Comparing the characterization and the colonizer/colonized relationship in the two plays, this paper illustrates that Aime Cesire’s A Tempest is a delivery of his idea of Negritude, a call for freedom and a reflection of the ways to gain the freedom. Key words: colonizer, colonized, Negritude, freedom Resume: Le theâtre du poete africain Aime Cesaire intitule Une tempete, adaptee d’apres La Tempete de Shakespeare, decrit la relation entre le colonisateur Prospero et les colonises Caliban et Ariel dans la perspective du colonise. Il constitue la proclamation de la pensee d’anti-colonialisme de l’auteur. A travers la comparaison de la description des personnages et de la relation colonisateur-colonise dans les deux theâtres, l’article present conclut qu’Une tempete de Cesaire exprime la negritude, l’appel a la liberte et la reflexion sur la voie de liberte. Mots-Cles: colonisateur, colonise, negritude, liberte

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.024
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207