MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1939071890

Banka ve finans kurumlarının ekonomik krizden etkilenme düzeyleri ve kriz döneminde uyguladıkları yönetsel ve örgütsel politikalara iliskin yönetici algıları

2012· article· tr· W1939071890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Özlem Balaban, Elvan Yildirim Okutan

Bibliographic record

VenueCentral bank review · 2012
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic, Social, and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringFinancial crisisFinancial systemQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsBusinessBusiness administrationFinanceMacroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, bank and financial institutions' level of being affected by financial crisis, which commenced in the last quarter of 2008 in the USA and has affected all the countries from west to east. and managerial and organizational policies implemented during this process was explored in accordance with the managers' perceptions. The study conducted via questionaires and interviews with high level authorities of various banks and financial institutions operating in Sakarya shows that aforementioned institutions' business volume and number of customers have considerably diminished so that they have been affected by the crisis but considering its managerial and organizational affect, major managerial, organizational policies and implementations problems have not been faced due to restructuring and arrangement in 2000 and 2001 crisis but being prudent as a necessity has been explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCentral bank reviewSame topicEconomic, Social, and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207