MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1939162859 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.1051

Granular cell tumour of the ureter: first case reported

2013· article· en· W1939162859 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rabii Madi, Neriman Gökden, Graham Greene

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTumors and Oncological Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUreterUreteroscopyAnastomosisNuclear medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 33-year-old woman presented with nonspecific, colicky pain ofthe left lower abdomen. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a2-cm mass engulfing the mid–left ureter. Ureteroscopy and biopsyrevealed normal mucosa, and CT-guided biopsy of the masswas nondiagnostic. The patient underwent laparoscopic exploration.A frozen section taken from the mass revealed a granularcell tumour. We excised the whole involved portion of the ureterand performed end-to-end ureteroureteral anastamosis. The postoperativecourse was uneventful. Examination of a segment ofresected ureter revealed a granular cell tumour diffusely infiltratingthe wall of the ureter. There were no features suggestinga malignant phenotype. On follow-up, the patient was found tohave developed a stricture at the anastomotic area, which wassuccessfully treated with balloon dilatation. To our knowledge,this is the first reported case of a granular cell tumour involvingthe ureter.Une patiente de 33 ans présente des douleurs non spécifiquesau quadrant inférieur gauche de l’abdomen rappelant des coliques.Une TDM révèle une masse de 2 cm englobant la portioncentrale de l’uretère gauche. Une urétéroscopie et une biopsiene révèlent aucune anomalie de la muqueuse, et une biopsiede la masse guidée par TDM n’a pas permis de poser un diagnostic.La patiente a subi un examen par laparoscopie. Des fragmentscongelés de la masse ont révélé une tumeur à cellules granuleuses.Une excision de la partie atteinte de l’uretère a été suivied’une anastomose urétéro-urétérale. Aucune complication postopératoiren’a été signalée. Le rapport final de pathologie faitétat d’une tumeur à cellules granuleuses s’étant infiltrée de façondiffuse dans la paroi de l’uretère. Aucune observation ne porteà croire à la présence d’un phénotype malin. Au suivi, la patienteprésentait une sténose de la région de l’anastomose qu’on a putraiter efficacement par dilatation par ballonnet. À notre connaissance,il s’agit du premier cas de tumeur à cellules granuleusestouchant l’uretère.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicTumors and Oncological CasesFrench-language works237,207