MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W193934551

Конкуренция Архангельского и Петербургского портов в первой четверти XVIII века

2011· article· ru· W193934551 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Северного (Арктического) федерального университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки · 2011
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireForeign policyPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceGovernment (linguistics)International tradePort (circuit theory)EconomyEconomic historyHistoryEconomicsLawPhilosophyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article covers the legal regulation of the Russian Empire foreign trade in the first quarter of the XVIII century. In view of economical and political reasonability the government realized a hard policy of the foreign trade reorientation from the port of Arkhangelsk to the newly ready-built Sankt-Petersburg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.007
Bibliometrics0.0040.012
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0120.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it