MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<sup>17</sup> O NMR Spectroscopy of α‐TeO <sub>2</sub> and Na <sub>2</sub> TeO <sub>3</sub>

2005· article· en· W1939604539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical shiftSpectroscopyChemistryOxideNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyNuclear magnetic resonanceParamagnetismAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryStereochemistryCondensed matter physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis of 17 O‐enriched α‐tellurite (α‐TeO 2 ) is described. TeO 2 is obtained stochiometrically by the reaction of tellurium isopropoxide with 17 O‐enriched H 2 O. The reaction is mild and simple and opens the field of tellurite‐based ceramics to 17 O nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We also report the first 17 O nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of α‐TeO 2 and Na 2 TeO 3 . Their isotropic chemical shifts, δ iso , are 180 ppm and 158 ppm, respectively, and their quadrupolar coupling parameters are C Q =7.48 MHz and η=0.43 for α‐TeO 2 , and C Q =6.63 MHz and η=0.33. By using extended Hückel tight binding calculations, we interpret the chemical shifts of tetravalent inorganic oxide network formers (SiO 2 , GeO 2 , and TeO 2 ) in terms of the local paramagnetic shielding effect. We also show that this is the predominant effect in determining the chemical shifts of non‐bridging oxide sites in this type of network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it