MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Textual Criticism of the Relations between the North tune ‘Baiyueting’and the South tune ‘Baiyueting’: by citing a wrong textual criticism

2010· article· en· W1939774568 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cui Mao-xin

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuanCriticismDramaPoetryLiteratureChinese literaturePoliticsArtHistoryHumanitiesChinaLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to a new “textual criticism” by a scholar, the Yuan drama ‘Baiyueting’of Guan Hanqing was adapted from the South tune “Baiyueting” The paper focuses on the status of the North tune “Baiyueting” and the poetry-related areas of the South tune “Baiyueting” after citing the wrong textual criticism. From the perspective of the development of the Chinese drama art history, the paper makes a deep ,penetrating and full analysis of the relations between the two and relative issues. As a result, the academic propositions are confirmed, such as “the North tune’ Baiyueting’ was created by Guan Hanqing on the basis of his own experiences in politics in the early stage of his creation”, “The South tune ‘Baiyueting’was created in the mid-Yuan dynasty by a person living in Hangzhou called Shihui by thinking over and over again of the North tune‘Baiyueting’”,“The two stages of the booming of the north tune‘Baiyueting’ and the development of the South tune ‘Baiyueting’ are two continual stages in the development history of the Chinese drama art, which are also by no means irreversible”, thus providing the academic support with new facts and the notion of original poetry for the rewriting or revising the development history of the Chinese drama. Keywords: the North tune‘Baiyueting’, the South tune ‘Baiyueting’, Place in the History of Literature, Old Edition of the Capital of Yan, Think over, Poetry-related area Resume Un certain savant a recemment proclame que Le Pavillon de l’adoration de la Lune de Guan Hanqing fut adapte du theatre du Sud du meme nom. Cet essai, partant de la place litteraire de l’opera du Nord Pavillon et le champ de lien de la versification du theaâtre du Sud Pavillon, analyse de facon approfondie et minutieuse leurs relations et des problemes concernes sous l’angle du developpement de l’art theâtral chinois. Cette recherche a abouti a confirmer les themes academiques comme « l’opera du Nord Pavillon, originaire de Guan Hanqing, fut cree au debut de sa carriere litteraire et inspire de son experience politique. » ; « le theâtre du Sud Pavillon fut adapte de l’ancienne edition de la capitale Yan par un habitant de Hangzhou Shi Hui en ajoutant de la musique et de la parole » ; « la prosperite de l’opera du Nord et l’essor du theâtre du Sud constituent deux phases etroitement liees dont la relation d’heritage est irreversible dans l’histoire de l’art theâtral chinois.», et a fournir un soutien academique dote de nouvelles decouvertes de fait et de la theorie de la versification des creations originales pour la revision de l’histoire de developpement de l’art theatrâl chinois. Mots-cles: opera du Nord Le Pavillon de l’adoration de la Lune ; theâtre du Sud Le Pavillon de l’adoration de la Lune , place littaraire, anncienne edition de la capitale Yan, champ de lien de la versification 摘要 有學者新近“考證”出“關漢卿的《拜月亭》雜劇是根據南戲改編的”。本文援此失敗的“考據結論”切入,著眼于北曲《拜月亭》的文學史地位與南戲《拜月亭》的詩學關聯域,對二者的關係及相關問題從中國戲曲藝術歷史發展的角度,作了深入、精微、詳實的考索與辯析,使“北曲《拜月亭》系關漢卿創作生涯早期取材於個人特殊政治情感遭際的原創作品”、“南戲《拜月亭》為元中葉杭州人施惠‘翻騰燕都舊本’而成的‘填詞和曲’作品”、“北曲鼎盛與南戲勃興是中國戲曲發展史上兩個前後銜接且傳承關係絕對不可逆轉的發展階段”等學術命題得到了確證,為重寫或改寫中國戲曲發展史,提供了具有新的事實發現及原創詩學理念的學術支持。 關鍵詞:北曲《拜月亭》;南戲《拜月亭》;文學史地位;燕都舊本;翻騰;詩學關聯域

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.019
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207