MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1939844720 · doi:10.7202/018307ar

Homme, femme, individualité et citoyenneté

2008· article· fr· W1939844720 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anne-Marie Daune-Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans nos sociétés, l’individu et l’individualité constituent le socle de la citoyenneté : pas de citoyenneté sans individualité, la citoyenne ou le citoyen est d’abord une ou un individu. Or, dans les philosophies sociales et politiques qui sont au principe de la définition des sociétés modernes, le rapport à l’individualité n’est pas conçu de la même façon pour les hommes et pour les femmes. L’auteure se penche sur les fondements du rapport entre individualité et citoyenneté en adoptant une lecture sexuée, ce retour pouvant éclairer les enjeux qui nourrissent le rapport hommes-femmes dans les démocraties modernes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.019
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207