MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940284379 · doi:10.11575/ajer.v60i3.55942

Developing Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices in First Nations Communities: Learning Anishnaabemowin and Land-Based Teachings

2014· article· en· W1940284379 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceSociologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesPedagogyEthnologyLibrary scienceArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First Nations schools in northern Ontario have the dual responsibility of providing students with the skills and foundation to thrive in their community as well as in higher education outside of their community. This responsibility requires teachers to be capable of developing and implementing lessons that support academic excellence and cultural enrichment. The findings within this article are from a study that asked experienced First Nations and non-Native teachers how non-Native teachers can learn to develop culturally responsive lessons in remote First Nations schools. Within the findings, Anishnaabemowin (Native language) and land-based activities are explored as rich sources for non-Native teachers to learn to develop culturally responsive lessons. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance of linguistic and cultural learning that is in relationship with [LR1] Elders, community members, and students. Les écoles des Premières Nations dans le nord de l’Ontario ont la double responsabilité de fournir aux élèves les habiletés et les assises pour qu’ils puissent s’épanouir à la fois dans leurs communautés et dans des établissements d’enseignement supérieur à l’extérieur de celles-ci. De cette responsabilité découle l’obligation des enseignants de développer et mettre en pratique des leçons qui appuient l’excellence académique et l’enrichissement culturel. Cet article porte sur une étude ayant demandé à des enseignants autochtones et non-autochtones d’expérience comment les enseignants non-autochtones des écoles des Premières Nations dans des régions éloignées pourraient apprendre à développer des leçons adaptées à la culture. Les résultats indiquent que le anishnaabemowin, une langue autochtone, et les activités rattachées aux ressources naturelles constituent d’importantes sources dans lesquelles les enseignants non-autochtones pourraient puiser pour créer des leçons adaptées à la culture. L’article conclut avec une discussion sur l’importance de l’apprentissage linguistique et culturel impliquant les Ainés, les membres de la communautés et les élèves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it