Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto apresenta uma série de idéias propostas pela equipe de pesquisadores do GRIPAL (Groupe de Recherches sur les Imaginaires Politiques en Amérique Latine), da Universidade de Quebec, em Montreal, acerca das relações entre os imaginários religiosos e políticos na América Latina. Tais formulações resultam de pesquisas de campo realizadas na Argentina, Brasil, Chile, México e Venezuela. A amostra é composta de dois terços de indivíduos das camadas desfavorecidas, pertencentes aos segmentos católico e evangélico (predominantemente pentecostais e neo-pentecostais), e de um terço de estudantes universitários. O texto analisa, em primeiro lugar, a impregnação do imaginário religioso nesses segmentos religiosos e sociais, em seguida, a presença do imaginário político e, por fim, analisa as relações existentes entre ambos os imaginários. No texto, é estabelecido um diálogo entre as formulações do mencionado grupo canadense e aquelas propostas por alguns autores latino-americanos acerca do mesmo objeto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".