MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940611380 · doi:10.1186/2050-5736-3-s1-p6

Simulating temperature distribution of high-intensity focused ultrasound during bone treatments

2015· article· en· W1940611380 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas J. Hudson, Thomas Looi, Adam C. Waspe, James M. Drake, Samuel Pichardo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Therapeutic Ultrasound · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundAblative caseMedicineFocused ultrasoundTherapeutic ultrasoundUltrasoundMagnetic resonance imagingAblationThermal ablationRadiologyRadiation therapyMedical physicsBiomedical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To help improve therapeutic results for treatment of bone tumors, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is being investigated as a non-invasive alternative to surgery and radiotherapy. HIFU ablative treatments require an imaging modality for guidance, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is currently the strongest choice as it is able to provide temperature mapping throughout the treatment process. Unfortunately, the temperature feedback that is critical to ensuring safety and optimal soft tissue ablation is often unobtainable in bone structures. As an alternative to obtaining feedback, this project is focused on developing a simulator that is capable of predicting the temperature distribution in and around bone tissue during HIFU therapy. Having such a simulation would provide a better understanding of the thermal dosages incurred by the bone during HIFU treatment of tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Therapeutic UltrasoundSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207