MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940640864 · doi:10.61490/eial.v25i1.890

Between the Local and the Transnational: New Historiographical Approaches on Argentine Political History, 1930 to 1943

2014· article· en· W1940640864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEIAL - Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArgentine historical studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyScholarshipIdeologyPoliticsEconomic historyGreat DepressionPolitical scienceHistoryEconomyPolitical economySociologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last two decades, new scholarship has revised one of the most contentiousperiods of twentieth-century Argentine history: the long decade of 1930-1943.These years have traditionally been the focus of strong political, ideological, andhistoriographical debates due, in great part, to their critical location as a hingebetween two other important periods. On the one hand, they represent the declineand crisis of the liberal republic, established in 1853, marked by the impactof the Great Depression in Argentina’s export economy as well as by the firstperiod of military rule in modern Argentine history, which began in September1930. On the other hand, the transformations experienced during those yearshave also been studied as the prelude to the rise of Juan Perón and his populistmovement, which began in full force with his participation in the military coupof June 1943 and the ensuing military regime of 1943-1946.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it