MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940877065 · doi:10.21083/csieci.v9i1.2147

The Field of Cultural Production and the Limits of Freedom in Improvisation

2014· article· en· W1940877065 on OpenAlex
Melvin Backstrom

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Music Education Insights
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImprovisationSociologyField (mathematics)EpistemologyProduction (economics)AestheticsMusicalOrder (exchange)Visual artsArtPhilosophyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper I apply Pierre Bourdieu's work on the field of cultural production to understand the limits of freedom in improvisationally-based music practices. While arguing for an awareness of the limitations of Bourdieu's theory, I argue that the strategies of social elevation he points out as so pervasive in cultural practices complicate assumptions of an anti-orthodox essence of "free improvisation." In order to therefore hold on to such a possibility, greater attention needs to be paid to the ways in which audiences are themselves constitutive of musical experiences, and to how this can be best realized by improvising performers, a process I begin by examining the practices of Sun Ra and the Grateful Dead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it