MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1940998556 · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgv030

The potential for chemical mixtures from the environment to enable the cancer hallmark of sustained proliferative signalling

2015· review· en· W1940998556 on OpenAlexaff
Wilhelm Engström, Philippa D. Darbre, Staffan Eriksson, Linda Gulliver, Tove Hultman, Michalis V. Karamouzis, James E. Klaunig, Rekha Mehta, Kim Moorwood, J. Thomas Sanderson, Pankaj Vadgama, Gerard Wagemaker, Andrew Ward, Neetu Singh, Fahd Al‐Mulla, Rabeah Al‐Temaimi, Amedeo Amedei, Annamaria Colacci, Monica Vaccari, Chiara Mondello, A. Ivana Scovassi, Jayadev Raju, Roslida Abd Hamid, Lorenzo Memeo, Stefano Forte, Rabindra Roy, Jordan Woodrick, Hosni Salem, Elizabeth P. Ryan, Dustin G. Brown, William H. Bisson

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier MuseumInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueHealth Canada
FundersFondazione CariploNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research CouncilUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsCell growthCell biologyCancer cellCellSignal transductionBiologyCancerChemistryCancer researchBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work is to review current knowledge relating the established cancer hallmark, sustained cell proliferation to the existence of chemicals present as low dose mixtures in the environment. Normal cell proliferation is under tight control, i.e. cells respond to a signal to proliferate, and although most cells continue to proliferate into adult life, the multiplication ceases once the stimulatory signal disappears or if the cells are exposed to growth inhibitory signals. Under such circumstances, normal cells remain quiescent until they are stimulated to resume further proliferation. In contrast, tumour cells are unable to halt proliferation, either when subjected to growth inhibitory signals or in the absence of growth stimulatory signals. Environmental chemicals with carcinogenic potential may cause sustained cell proliferation by interfering with some cell proliferation control mechanisms committing cells to an indefinite proliferative span.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarcinogenesisSame topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207