PEMBELAJARAN KONSTRUKTIVISTIK MENINGKATKAN CARA BERPIKIR DIVERGEN SISWA SD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan model pembelajaran konstruktivistik yangefektif untuk mengembangkan cara berpikir divergen dan konvergen siswa SD. Metodepenelitian yang digunakan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut adalah pendekatan R&D(Research and Development) model Borg and Gall. Hasil penelitian adalah; 1) pembelajarandi SD Sleman Iebih dominan mengembangkan cara berpikir konvergen daripada caraberpikir divergen, 2) model pembelajaran yang sering diterapkan guru adalah modelpembelajaran ekspositori, yang menjadikan metode ceramah sebagai metode utama, 3)penerapan model pembelajaran konstruktivistik mampu meningkatkan cara berpikirdivergen dan konvergen siswa SD, 4) penerapan model pembelajaran konstruktivistikmampu meningkatkan aktivitas belajar siswa SD, 5) penerapan model pembelajarankonstruktivistik mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa SD, dan 6) sistem evaluasiportofolio mampu meningkatkan aktivitas belajar siswa SD
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".