Experimental results for a pulsed vortex water wall high-pressure argon lamp
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents experimental results for a pulsed vortex water wall high pressure arc lamp. The power source consists of a DC ignitor connected in series with a sustaining source. The ignitor is shorted after a sustaining current is achieved, followed by the connection of a regulated pulsed current source connected in parallel with the sustaining source. The application of this lamp in rapid thermal processing systems dictates that the interpulse period of the pulsed source be made as short as possible. Experiments have been performed with and without the sustaining source. Arc overvoltage after the current is reapplied becomes larger as the interpulse period is made longer. Overvoltages are higher if no sustaining source is used during the interpulse period. An acoustic resonance is observed with a duration equal to the axial convective transit time. A sustaining source may not be required based on the results of the experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it