MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1941419763 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/153

AN EXTENDED VIEW OF THE PISCES OVERDENSITY FROM THE SCUSS SURVEY

2015· article· en· W1941419763 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaYork UniversityOffice of SciencePrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCarnegie Mellon UniversityHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityNational Science FoundationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityBrookhaven National LaboratoryEuropean Commission
KeywordsMilky WayHaloRR Lyrae variableStarsGalactic haloGlobular clusterLocal GroupGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The South Galactic Cap u -band Sky Survey (SCUSS) is a u -band photometric survey covering about 4000 square degrees of the South Galactic Cap, reaching depths of up to 23 mag. By extending around 1.5 mag deeper than the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) single-epoch u data, SCUSS is able to probe a much larger volume of the outer halo, i.e., with SCUSS data blue horizontal branch (BHB) stars can trace the outer halo of the Milky Way as far as 100–150 kpc. Utilizing this advantage we combine the SCUSS u- band with the SDSS DR9 gri photometric bands to identify BHB stars and explore halo substructures. We confirm the existence of the Pisces overdensity, which is a structure in the outer halo (at around 80 kpc) that was discovered using RR Lyrae stars. For the first time we are able to determine its spatial extent, finding that it appears to be part of a stream with a clear distance gradient. The stream, which is ∼5° wide and stretches along ∼25°, consists of 20–30 BHBs with a total significance of around 6 σ over the background. Assuming we have detected the entire stream and that the progenitor has fully disrupted, then the number of BHBs suggests that the original system was similar to a smaller classical or a larger ultra-faint dwarf galaxy. On the other hand, if the progenitor still exists, it can be hunted for by reconstructing its orbit from the distance gradient of the stream. This new picture of the Pisces overdensity sheds new light on the origin of this intriguing system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207