Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beautiful British Columbia, ca i : 2,400,000. Victoria, Tourism British Columbia, 1978. British Columbia agriculture reporting regions (ISAG). 1:5,000,000. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. British Columbia air facilities map. 1:1,900,800. Vancouver, B.C., British Columbia Aviation Council, 1977. British Columbia community health programs. Health unit boundaries. 1 .-5,322,240. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1977. British Columbia Corrections Branch regions: administrative boundaries. 1:2,000,000. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. British Columbia counties, amended to July 1, 1965 (ISG). Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. Reprinted without sheriffs districts. British Columbia highways districts as at April 1, igj8 (IJV). 1:2,000,000. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. British Columbia mining divisions 1958. 1:5,322,240. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. British Columbia mining divisions (ISD). 1:5,000,000. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. British Columbia tidal waters sport fishing guide, 19J7. ca 1:800,000. Vancouver, Canadian Dept. of Fisheries and Environment, 1977. Corrections up to 26 Nov. 1976. British Columbia water districts (ISW). 1:5,000,000. Victoria, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1978. Close-up: Canada — British Columbia, Alberta and Yukon Territory. 1:3,500,000. Washington, D.C., National Geographic Society, 1978. Forest Services recreation sites, north Fraser Valley. 1:125,000. Victoria, Ministry of Forests, 1977. Kitimat-Stikine Industrial corridor, ca 1:138,000. Coquitlam, B.C., Canadian Cartographies for Regional District of Kitimat-Stikine, 1978. Northern B.C. coastline wildlife resources map. ca 1:580,000. Victoria, Fish and Wildlife Branch, 1977. Road map of the Fraser Valley and northwest Washington State. ca 1:180,000. North Vancouver, B.C., Alco Maps for Alcomaps and Vancouver Island Tourist Services, 1977.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Listing of maps of British Columbia published in 1977-1978; a bibliographic list, not a bibliometric study.
It is a catalog-like listing of maps rather than research about research.
Bibliographic list of BC maps is cartographic inventory, not a study of research.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.364 | 0.224 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".