MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resolutions of Modern Environmental Issues: Public Participation in Environmental Affairs

2013· article· en· W1941535838 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Meng Tang, Yan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and soil sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyPublic participationPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsConstructivism (international relations)SociologyPublic administrationLawInternational relationsPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By analyzing the development of environmental issues, this paper finds that environmental issues in modern society are tightly linked with human activities, which is presented in such features as high-tech background and its risks, complicated conflict of interest, the unity of objective facts and subjective constructivism, etc. To solve modern environmental issues, we have no choice but to be assisted by democratic forces, which specifically depends on public participation in environmental issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.016
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicPlant and soil sciencesFrench-language works237,207