MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differential Regulation of Transmitter Release by Alternatively Spliced Forms of Synaptotagmin I

2003· article· en· W1941552958 on OpenAlexafffund
Arash Nakhost, Gry Houeland, Vincent F. Castellucci, Wayne S. Sossin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSynaptotagmin 1NeuroscienceDifferential (mechanical device)TransmitterSynaptotagmin IBiologyChemistryCell biologyPhysicsComputer scienceGeneticsSynaptic vesicleTelecommunicationsVesicleMembraneChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discovered a novel alternatively spliced form of synaptotagmin I (Syt I). This splicing event is conserved over evolution and, in Aplysia, results in a two amino acid insert in the juxtamembrane domain of Syt I (Syt IVQ). Both Syt I and Syt IVQ are localized to synaptic vesicles; however, we also observed punctae that contained one or the other spliced products. Both Syt I and Syt IVQ are phosphorylated at the adjacent PKC site. Overexpression of Syt IVQ, but not of Syt I, in Aplysia neurons blocked the ability of serotonin to reverse synaptic depression. This effect is upstream of PKC activation, because neither Syt IVQ nor Syt I blocked the effects of phorbol esters on reversing synaptic depression or the effects of serotonin on facilitating nondepressed synapses. Our results demonstrate a physiological role for splicing in the juxtamembrane domain of Syt I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207