MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1941612930 · doi:10.5430/jms.v6n3p21

An Empirical Study of Alxa League Energy Consumption and Environmental Pollution in China

2015· article· en· W1941612930 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peilin Li, Jialin Liu, Haiying Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Strategy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionChinaEnvironmental pollutionConsumption (sociology)PollutionNatural resource economicsLeagueEnvironmental scienceBusinessEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental planningEnvironmental protectionEconomicsGeographyEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of the continual increase of the energy consumption and the long-standing patterns of extensive consumption about energy in Alxa, it is significance to the problem of environmental pollution. Alxa is main neighborhoods for Mongolian in northwest China, where the ecological environment is quite fragile and environmental pollution has had a negative impact on local desert ecological environment and economic continual development. Since 1980, the fragile environment increasingly become one of the major obstacles to continued economic development of Alxa; In particular, the severity of environmental problems that become the focus of Alxaess and Chinese has affected the industrial development Alxa in 2014. Firstly, the paper reads energy consumption leads to environmental pollution. Secondly, it depicts the causes of the problem from the Amounts of energy consumption and industrial structure. Finally, the suggestion, including Optimized energy consumption structure, modify the industrial structure, Introduced Market Mechanism and so on, is made to solve the environmental problems in Alxa League.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and StrategySame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207