MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1941745271 · doi:10.5006/c2003-03252

Corrosion Protection for Bolting in Marine Environments

2003· article· en· W1941745271 on OpenAlexaff
K. Stevens, K. D. Efird

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoltingCorrosionEnvironmental scienceForensic engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgyEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The nut and bolt thread protector system is a patented, ultraviolet stabilized polyethylene thread protector which seals nut and bolt threads in pressurized grease to effectively prevent corrosion and provide protection against physical damage. Laboratory corrosion testing has shown no corrosion on bolting using this system in 90-day ASTM B 117 salt spray tests and in 60-day wet sour gas tests. The system has proven its effectiveness for the corrosion protection of bolting in many marine applications. The corrosion protection provided allows removing the nut from the bolt after long exposure in corrosive environments without the use of special tools, and dramatically extends the useful life of the nut and bolt. The result is the elimination change-outs required from corrosion damage and significantly easier change outs when they are required for operational reasons, providing significant time savings for maintenance personnel. The system is state-of-the-art in corrosion protection for bolting in corrosive marine environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Integrity and Reliability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207