MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Community Driven Development in Bangladesh: Factors Behind the Reality

2011· article· en· W1941834419 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Harold Sougato Baroi, Golam Rabbani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)NewspaperHumanitiesCommunity developmentSociologyPublic relationsLibrary scienceGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Community driven development (CDD) is a widely used word in development discussions in the third world countries. Community participation in development planning, implementation and also in the befit sharing is like foundation stone for CDD. This paper is an attempt to address those factors in the context of Bangladesh. Here in this paper secondary source of information from recent publications, journals, books, research reports and articles of newspapers and internet have taken into consideration. There are also some case studies ( primary data) used to reflect on real life experiences at community level. Bangladesh with an ever increasing population has always depended on different actors like NGOs, Community Based Organization (CBOs) to work alongside with the government. It has been proved in many cases that community involved in planning and implementation process made significant changes in community development. There are also several factors both at the demand and supply side that contributes to CDD. Key words: Community driven development; Contextual factors; Demand side factors; Supply side factors; NGOs; Community based organization Resume: La Communaute dirigeant le Developpement (CDD) est un mot largement utilise dans les discussions sur le developpement dans les pays du tiers monde. La participation communautaire a la planification du developpement, la mise en œuvre et aussi dans le partage conviennent a la premiere pierre pour la CDD. Ce 1 document est une tentative pour repondre a ces facteurs dans le contexte du Bangladesh. Ici, dans cette source d'alimentation papier secondaire des informations tirees de publications recentes, revues, livres, rapports de recherche et d'articles de journaux et d'Internet ont pris en consideration. Il ya aussi quelques etudes de cas (donnees primaires) utilise pour reflechir sur des experiences reelles au niveau communautaire. Bangladesh avec une population sans cesse croissante a toujours dependu des differents acteurs comme les ONG, l'Organisation communautaire (CBO), de travailler aux cotes du gouvernement. Il a ete prouve dans de nombreux cas que la communaute impliques dans la planification et le processus de mise en œuvre apporte des changements importants dans le developpement communautaire. Il ya egalement plusieurs facteurs a la fois au cote de la demande et l'offre qui contribue au CDD. Mots cles: La Communaute menant le developpement; Les facteurs contextuels; Les facteurs de la demande; Les facteurs d'offre; Les ONG; L'organisation a base communautaire

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207