MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942017954

Protecting a MPLS multicast session tree with bounded switchover time

2010· article· en· W1942017954 on OpenAlexaff
Guoming Wei, Chung–Horng Lung, Anand Srinivasan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsEion (Canada)Carleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitchoverComputer scienceComputer networkPath protectionMulticastMultiprotocol Label SwitchingBackupDistributed computingFailoverQuality of serviceOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an algorithm to protect a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) multicast tree from a single link failure with bounded switchover time. Existing protecting algorithms include link protection, path protection, dual tree protection, and redundant tree protection. The problems with these algorithms are that they either provide an unbounded switchover time—meaning that in the case of a link failure, the time it takes for the algorithm to discover and switch the traffic over to a backup path is not predictable—or the bandwidth required for such protection is high. The proposed algorithm provides a guaranteed bounded switchover time, while making efficient use of the protection resources. The switchover time for the proposed algorithm is not fixed, but it gives the network administrator greater flexibility, according to the requirements from the MPLS multicast session as well as the availability of the network resources. An easy-to-use network topology builder and a simulator were implemented for the approach. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed backup path approach with bandwidth optimization significantly reduces the cost of protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication SystemsSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207