MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942218439 · doi:10.1109/pac.1997.752763

60 keV beam transport line and switch-yard for ISAC

2002· article· en· W1942218439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeam (structure)Ion sourcePhysicsNuclear physicsIon beamNuclear engineeringEngineeringPlasmaOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ISAC project under construction at TRIUMF is to consist of radioactive ion sources, a high resolution mass separator, a low-energy (60 keV) experimental area, RFQ and DTL linacs to reach 1.5 MeV per atomic mass unit (amu), and a high-energy experimental area. Additionally, there will be a stable off-line source primarily for commissioning the linacs but also for use by the low-energy experimental program. The transport line which connects these elements therefore includes a switch which allows either the radioactive beam to supply the low energy area simultaneously with the off-line source supplying the RFQ, or the radioactive beam supplying beam to the RFQ simultaneously with the off-line source supplying beam to the low-energy experiments. The maximum ion source voltage is 60 kV. The RFQ accepts particles with 2 keV per amu, so masses less than 30 must have lower energy and masses larger than 30 can only be accelerated if they are multiply-charged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it