MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942549021

Profile of patients with personality disorder diagnosis at a mental health services clinic

2013· article· es· W1942549021 on OpenAlexaff
Leonardo Naves dos Reis, Emilene Reisdorfer, Edilaine Cristina da Silva Gherardi‐Donato

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthPersonalityPsychiatryPsychologyClinical psychologyPersonality profileBig Five personality traitsSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los trastornos de personalidad constituyen una calidad persistente de vivencia íntima o comportamiento distinto de las normas sociales y de la cultura vigente. El objetivo de este trabajo fue verificar la superioridad de portadores de trastornos de personalidad en un servicio de ambulatorio de salud mental, así como identificar sus características socio-demográficas. Se realizó un estudio transversal descriptivo y exploratorio. Aproximadamente 16% presentaron como diagnóstico principal trastorno de personalidad. El tipo más prevalente fue el trastorno de personalidad emocionalmente inestable o borderline, en mujeres, jóvenes, con baja escolaridad y cerca del 16% ya necesitaron una internación hospitalaria en la vida. Los resultados logrados en eses estudio permiten una mejor comprensión de las necesidades de los usuarios y pueden auxiliar en la definición de estrategias de servicio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207