MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942711900 · doi:10.1109/iciprm.1993.380697

Atomic layer epitaxy of InP and InAs/InP heterostructures

2002· article· en· W1942711900 on OpenAlexafffund
C. A. Tran, R. A. Masut, J. L. Brebner, M. Jouanne, R. Leonelli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeterojunctionSuperlatticeOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceAtomic layer epitaxyEpitaxyPhotoluminescenceRaman spectroscopyDiffractionLattice (music)Layer (electronics)Condensed matter physicsOpticsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The samples used for this study were InAs/InP strained single quantum wells and strained superlattices (SLS) grown by atomic layer epitaxy (ALE). The growth of InAs on InP is strongly influenced by the large lattice mismatch (3.22%). High resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) was carried out. HRXRD can be used to quickly and precisely evaluate the ALE self-limiting growth rate of both InP and InAs. Using interference of X-ray wave fields in a ALE grown InP with an InAs marker layer the authors have accurately determined the growth per cycle. Raman spectra of AL grown InAs/InP SLSs show clearly the longitudinal acoustical folded modes and the longitudinal optic confined modes for both InAs and InP layers. The results indicate that despite the 3.2% lattice mismatch, ALE is a powerful method for fabricating highly strained InAs/InP structures with atomically controlled heterointerfaces.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207