MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942738271 · doi:10.1109/intlec.1997.646062

Design for EMI compliance for a compact 3000 W system

2002· article· en· W1942738271 on OpenAlexaff
J.-F. Chouinard, L. Duguay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEMIElectromagnetic interferenceElectrical engineeringElectromagnetic compatibilityPower (physics)Electric power systemTelecommunications equipmentEngineeringInterference (communication)Noise (video)TelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low levels of electromagnetic interference emissions of power equipment are mandatory to avoid interactions between the power system and other telecommunication equipment located in close proximity. No malfunctions due to EMI are tolerable between different types of equipment. The power system should be designed such that it is immune to the emission of other equipment, Also the power system EMI noise must be below the acceptable limit of other type of telecommunication equipment. The stringent Class B requirements of emission of FCC and CISPR are replacing Class A as the standard to be achieved for a telecommunication power system. The paper describes all the design philosophy for EMI compliance of a typical compact power system. An example of a 3000 W power system that meets CISPR22 Class B and FCC Class B is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207