MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1942828271 · doi:10.3138/topia.26.69

Remembering <i>Devdas</i>: Travels, Transformations and Persistence of Images, Bollywood-Style

2011· article· en· W1942828271 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Madhuja Mukherjee

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Cinema and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNovellaBengaliHindiPartition (number theory)ColonialismStyle (visual arts)HistoryCapital (architecture)GlobalizationLiteratureAncient historyArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyMathematicsLawLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay studies different Hindi film adaptations of Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s canonical Bengali novella Devdas, published in 1917. Briefly, the paper argues that the various iterations of Devdas produce a complex history of cinematic development in India, shaped as they are by significant moments: World War II; the 1947 Partition of British India into India and Pakistan and its resultant multiple displacements; the rural-urban transformations of the 1950s; postcolonial problems; and the cross-border migrations and circulation of people, audiences, films and capital in the post-globalization era. Thus, in my attempt to read the travels and transformation of cinematic codes through the various adaptations of Devdas, a larger historical trajectory of national and diasporic dislocation becomes evident, revealing a deeply complicated history of colonial and postcolonial India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicSouth Asian Cinema and CultureFrench-language works237,207