MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efeitos da tarefa subsequente ao sentar e levantar sobre a ativação muscular e início do movimento

2013· article· pt· W1942994063 on OpenAlexaff
Franciele Camila da Silva, Rodrigues Ana Melissa, Matheus Joner Wiest

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTask (project management)Physical medicine and rehabilitationKinematicsGaitComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muscle activation (activation time) and the beginning of movement (motor reaction time) can be changed depending on the complexity of the task. The objectives of this study were to compare the time for activation of the paraspinal and the vastus lateralis muscles, and the motor reaction time during the execution of the tasks sit-to-stand (STS) and sit-to-walk (STW), which includes the execution of the subsequent task of gait initiation. Twelve healthy young subjects participated in the study. They performed two tasks(STS and STW), five times each, randomly, separated by two minutes of rest. The kinematics of the movement were recorded using a digital electrogoniometer attached to the hip joint and muscle activation using surface electromyographyin both muscles. The average of the five repetitions was calculated for each task. The beginning of the task was signaled by a luminous device, which was also used to identify the initial point for calculating the activation time andmotor reaction time. Both muscles showed a longer latency for the activation time and motor reaction time during the STW task when compared with STS. Basedon these results, it can be concluded that both the postural (paraspinal) and prime mover muscles (vastus lateralis) undergo change in the motor programming during the execution of the STS task when a subsequent task (gait initiation) is included. Motor programming is dependent on task complexity, where a more complex task (STW) will result in delays of movement programming and execution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human PerformanceSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207