Bibliographic record
Abstract
En s'appuyant sur un certain nombre d'apports scientifiques et théoriques récents de la sociologie du curriculum, l'auteur analyse certaines caractéristiques structurelles et culturelles des savoirs scolaires dans les sociétés contemporaines. La réflexion porte successivement sur les mécanismes de la sélection opérée au sein de la culture en vue de la constitution des programmes scolaires, sur les effets de la contrainte didactique et sur les traits originaux de la culture scolaire, sur la structuration des savoirs scolaires sous forme de territoires disciplinaires compartimentés, sur les phénomènes de stratification et de légitimation sociale de ces savoirs. Enfin, la question est posée de savoir si une telle approche analytique et critique du curriculum implique nécessairement une conception relativiste de la connaissance et de la culture ou peut rester compatible avec l'exigence proprement pédagogique d'une justification intellectuelle et culturelle "normative" des contenus d'enseignement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".