MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1943112181 · doi:10.2514/1.a33179

Structural Dynamics and Attitude Control of a Solar Sail Using Tip Vanes

2015· article· en· W1943112181 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spacecraft and Rockets · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar sailAttitude controlNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Finite element methodController (irrigation)Aerospace engineeringDynamics (music)Computer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Structural engineeringPhysicsPropulsionAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper delves into the structural and attitude dynamics of a cord-mat square solar sail being controlled by two-degree-of-freedom tip-vane actuation. The paper’s main goal is to simulate and analyze the behavior of a solar sail under a tip-vane attitude control scheme using a geometrically nonlinear elastic finite element method model of the sail. The controller/structural interaction is of particular interest, as the control solution of the two-degree-of-freedom tip-vane actuation is based on a flat, inflexible sail. The sail structure is further augmented by a wrinkling model for handling the membranes under negative strain. The model is further augmented by the disturbance forces produced by the reflective sail membrane itself. A combined, dynamic simulation of all of the aforementioned are performed to analyze the performance of the control system as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it