Ensembles of exemplar-SVMs for video face recognition from a single sample per person
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recognizing the face of target individuals in a watch-list is among the most challenging applications in video surveillance, especially when enrollment is based on one reference still facial image. Besides the limited representativeness of facial models used for matching, the appearance of faces captured in videos varies due to changes in illumination, pose, scales, etc., and to camera inter-operability. A multi-classifier system is proposed in this paper for robust still-to-video face recognition (FR) based on multiple diverse face representations. An individual-specific ensemble of exemplar-SVMs (e-SVMs) classifiers is assigned to each target person, where each classifier is trained using a high-quality reference face still versus many lower-quality faces of non-target individuals captured in videos. Diverse face representations are generated from different patches isolated in facial images and face descriptors that are robust to various nuisance factors (e.g., illumination and pose) commonly encountered in surveillance environments. Discriminant feature subsets, training samples, and ensemble fusion functions are selected using faces of non-target individuals captured in videos of the scene. Experiments on videos from the Chokepoint dataset reveal that the proposed ensemble of e-SVMs outperforms state-of-the-art FR systems specialized for the single sample per person problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".