MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1943389991 · doi:10.1093/pch/16.3.152

Letter to the Editor

2011· letter· en· W1943389991 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTattoo and Body Piercing Complications
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

issue of Paediatrics & Child Health (1), that no child was poisoned by jewellery between 1997 and 2006 at CHU Sainte-Justine in Montreal, Quebec, should not engender complacency. In the United States, one child was sickened in 2004 and one child died in 2006 following ingestion of lead-containing baubles (2). Indeed, objects other than dense metal items (eg, jewellery, lead shot and fishing weights) may also be problematic. Paint on toys and beads, as well as ceramics and vinyl products may contain 'migratable' lead that could dissolve or be rubbed or sucked off (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicTattoo and Body Piercing ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207