Plus ça change" : los efectos de la región, número de asignaturas de ciencias cursadas y sexo sobre la opinión de los estudiantes canadienses en cuestiones de Ciencia, Técnica y Sociedad
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analysis of Canadian high school students' views on science -technology -society issues was undertaken in order to see if educationally significant differences in response were attributable to changes in three variables. The variables were: the region in which the students lived, the number of science courses being taken by the responding students, and the sex of the responder. On the whole, few variations among students' responses were found. The variations reported in the paper included the findings that Maritimer students tend to have a more idealistic view of how scientists conduct their work, that students who are taking three science courses have a greater understanding of the role of models in science, and that males, apart from a small group of male chauvinists, offer the same reasons as females to explain why there are fewer Canadian female scientists than males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it