MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1943683166 · doi:10.3968/3925

Climate Change Mediated Actinidic Archaeal Endosymbiosis Generates Neanderthal Hybrids and Mind-Body Phenotypic Change

2013· article· en· W1943683166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ravikumar Kurup, Parameswara Achutha Kurup

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysautonomiaBiologyEndosymbiosisNeuroscienceDiseasePathologyMedicineGeneticsGenePlastid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Actinidic archaea has been related to global warming and human diseases especially autoimmune disease, neuro-degeneration, neuropsychiatric disorder, neoplasm and metabolic syndrome x. The growth of endosymbiotic actinidic archaea in relation to climate change and global warming leads to nean-derthalisation of the human mind-body system. Neanderthal anthropometry and metabolonomics has been described in autoimmune disease, neuro-degeneration, neuropsychiatric disorder, neoplasm and metabolic syndrome x especially the Warburg phenotype and hyperdigoxinemia. Digoxin produced by archaeal cholesterol catabolism produces Nean-derthalisation. Prefrontal cortical atrophy and cerebellar hyperplasia has been related to autoimmune disease, neuro-degeneration, neuropsychiatric disorder, neoplasm and metabolic syndrome x in this communication. This leads on to dysautonomia with sympathetic hyperactivity and parasympathetic neuropathy in these disorders. Actinidic archaeal related cerebellar dominance leads to changes in brain function. The data is described in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciencesSame topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207