MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1944177962 · doi:10.7202/1028873ar

Web design et pratique collaborative : le développement d’un site Web pour la jeunesse

2015· article· fr· W1944177962 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julie Fortin, Virginie Martel

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb and Library Services
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesWeb siteArtWorld Wide WebComputer scienceThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le développement d’un site Web pour le public des 6 à 12 ans aux bibliothèques publiques de Montréal s’est fait en tenant compte des objectifs organisationnels, des besoins du public-cible et des enjeux liés à la spécificité montréalaise. Cet article fait état des démarches et des approches qui ont été employées afin d’élaborer l’offre de services du site et de sélectionner une méthode de publication Web permettant d’implémenter des services interactifs et participatifs à l’intention, à la fois, des jeunes et des bibliothécaires appelés à leur proposer des contenus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0110.034
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentation et bibliothèquesSame topicWeb and Library ServicesFrench-language works237,207