Faktor Risiko yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Tuberkulosis Paru di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Andalas Tahun 2013
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstrakTuberkulosis (TB) paru di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Andalas menduduki peringkat ke-2 kasus TB terbanyak di kota Padang.Belum banyak penelitian sebelumnya mengenai faktor risiko tuberkulosis paru di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Andalas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat faktror risiko apa yang berhubungan dengan kejadian TB paru di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Andalas tahun 2013. Adapun faktor risiko yang diteliti yakni berupa status gizi, riwayat penyakit diabetes mellitus (DM), kondisi ventilasi rumah, kepadatan hunian rumah, dan pencahayaan rumah.Penelitian ini menggunakan desain case control.Sampel pada penelitian ini berjumlah 66, yakni terdiri dari 33 kasus (didapat dari rekam medis Puskesmas Andalas) dan 33 kontrol (sesuai kriteria inklusi kontrol).Data primer diperoleh dari wawancara dan pengukuran lansung. Hasil uji statistik dengan menggunakan uji chi square didapatkan faktor risiko yang berhubungan dengan kejadian TB paru adalah status gizi riwayat penyakit DM, kondisi ventilasi rumah, kepadatan hunian, dan pencahayaan rumah. Status gizi dan pencahayaan rumah secara statistic memiliki hubungan yang bermakna dengan kejadian TB paru, sedangkan riwayat penyakit DM, ventilasi dan kepadatan hunian secara statistik tidak memiliki hubungan yang bermakna dengan kejadian TB paru.Kata kunci: tuberkulosis paru, faktor risikoAbstractPulmonary Tuberculosis in Andalas Public Health Center was where the second largest number of TB cases found in 2012. There is not many study before about risk factors of pulmonary tuberculosis in the working area of Andalas Pulic Health Care. This study aims to know what are the risk factors of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the working area of Andalas public health center in 2013. The risk factors were studied in this study are nutritional status, Diabetes mellitus, home ventilation, home occupancy density, and home lighting. This Study used a case control design. Samples in this study were 66 respondent consisting of 33 cases (obtained from medical record of Andalas public health center) and 33 controls (according to the inclusion criteria of controls). Primary data was got by interviews and direct measurement. The result of statistical test using chi square test can be concluded that risk factors that associated with pulmonary tuberculosis are nutritional status, diabetes mellitus, home ventilation, home occupancy density, and home lighting. Nutritional status and home lightting statistically are associated with pulmonary tuberculosis. In the other hand Diabetes mellitus history, home ventilation, and home occupancy density statistically are not associated with pulmonary tuberculosis.Keywords:pulmonary tuberculosis, risk factors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it