Les Soeurs Grises à l’Université de Montréal, 1923-1947 : dela gestion hospitalière à l’enseignement supérieur en nursing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the role of the Grey Nuns in the development of the teaching of nursing in Quebec universities. The authors analyze the processes which have led to the formalization of this discipline through the examination of their archives and those of the Faculty of Nursing Science of the Université de Montréal. They reveal the transfer of practical knowledge that Grey Nuns have acquired as administrators in the major hospitals of the country to theoretical knowledge which is essential to the establishment of nursing as a science. In this manner, the Grey Nuns have also been involved in the process of secularization of health care while confirming their irrevocable tie to Catholic methodologies. Thus emerges a model of care as the structural element of hospital organization resisting the multiple transformations in the health care field in the period following the First World War. Furthermore, in relation to other works, the importance of this model is highlighted as well as its continuance in the educational and health care system in spite of the democratization and secularization movement in the 1970s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".