Substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) based antenna in remote respiratory sensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a hospital environment, continuous monitoring of respiratory activity in a patient moved from intensive care unit may prevent incidence of central sleep apnea (CSA). CSA is difficult to predict and can be life-threatening. Some of the existing respiratory monitoring methods require direct contact with the patient; such as placing electrodes on the skin or wearing a monitoring belt around the chest. Other monitoring devices are bulky and invasive such as the spirometer which involves the patient breathing through a mouthpiece; and is thus, inconvenient. Additionally, the aforementioned monitoring methods/ devices are not suitable for critically ill patients that may not tolerate a mouthpiece, or burn-injured patients that cannot tolerate wearing a monitoring belt. Consequently, there is a need to develop remote/non-contact devices to continuously monitor respiratory activity in a reliable and non-invasive way. Optical techniques have been utilized for remote respiratory monitoring with reported high sensitivity; however, they cannot penetrate clothing. Therefore, microwave techniques have been explored due to their inherent advantage of penetrating clothes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".