Implement And Counter Plan of Labor Contract Law between Labor Dispatch and Outsourcing in Liaoning Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Labor Contract Law made a specific rule to labor dispatch and ended the past of it with no law to comply to. Aiming to labor abuses, no aptitude to labor dispatch, unclear duty and the problem of equal pay for equal work etc, this article made analyses and worked out the counter plans to above issues by combining related rules in Labor Contract Law to particular case in Liaoning province. Key words : Labor dispatch; Outsourcing; Labor Contract Law Resume La loi du le contrat de travail a fait une regle specifi que a l’expedition du travail et a pris fi n le passe de celui-ci avec aucune loi pour se conformer a. Visant a des abus du travail, pas d’aptitude a l’expedition du travail, le devoir clair et le probleme du salaire egal pour un travail egal, etc, cet article fait une analyse et elabore des plans contre les questions ci-dessus en combinant des regles liees a la loi le contrat de travail au cas particulier dans le Liaoning province. Mots cles : Travail d’expedition; L’externalisation; La loi du contrat de travail
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".