MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1944831574 · doi:10.15353/pced.v11i0.13

Municipal GIS in Northern Ontario status and strategies

2014· article· en· W1944831574 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Théo Noel de Tilly

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers in Canadian Economic Development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZoningGeographic information systemSoftware deploymentGIS applicationsEnvironmental planningGIS DayGeographyEnvironmental resource managementGIS file formatKey (lock)GIS and public healthAM/FM/GISComputer scienceRemote sensingCivil engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are an important tool for economic developers to capture, manipulate and interpret local data from a myriad of sources including municipal infrastructure data, land assets, local zoning by-laws, building codes, local maps and aerial photographs. This paper provides a description of GIS technologies and applications; reviews the status of municipal GIS across Northern Ontario and; presents key success elements that should be considered by municipal governments and their staff when developing GIS strategies and networks. The elements will increase the likelihood of a successful deployment and the long-term viability of the GIS solution.Keywords: Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Northern Ontario, municipal governments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapers in Canadian Economic DevelopmentSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207