Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tandis que la plupart des économistes attribuent la crise financière de 2007-2008 aux incohérences des marchés financiers, un certain nombre d’économistes, surtout hétérodoxes, associent cette crise à des éléments structurels, notamment la croissance des inégalités, mesurée par la progression de la part des profits dans le revenu national et par la dispersion des salaires. L’auteur présente les résultats d’un projet de recherche dont les différents modules ont analysé les causes de ces évolutions ainsi que les conséquences négatives de la baisse de la part des salaires pour la croissance de la demande et la croissance de la productivité. Les politiques néolibérales ont donc eu des effets néfastes pour l’économie, effets qui n’ont pu être compensés que temporairement par des artifices comme l’endettement accru des ménages et les politiques de croissance par les exportations. Il importe donc de faire marche arrière, et de revenir à des politiques favorisant le plein emploi et la relance par les salaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".