MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1945239439 · doi:10.1002/jgt.21903

Interval Minors of Complete Bipartite Graphs

2015· article· en· W1945239439 on OpenAlexaff
Bojan Mohar, Arash Rafiey, B. Tayfeh‐Rezaie, Hehui Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graph Theory · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicLimits and Structures in Graph Theory
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersAmerican Roentgen Ray Society
KeywordsCombinatoricsBipartite graphMathematicsInterval (graph theory)Minor (academic)Robertson–Seymour theoremDiscrete mathematicsComplete bipartite graphIndifference graphCographUpper and lower boundsStrong perfect graph theorem1-planar graphChordal graphGraphLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Interval minors of bipartite graphs were recently introduced by Jacob Fox in the study of Stanley–Wilf limits. We investigate the maximum number of edges in ‐interval minor‐free bipartite graphs. We determine exact values when and describe the extremal graphs. For , lower and upper bounds are given and the structure of ‐interval minor‐free graphs is studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Graph TheorySame topicLimits and Structures in Graph TheoryFrench-language works237,207