Bibliographic record
Abstract
La oposicion documental/ficcion estructura toda la historia del cine y se renueva constantemente segun las epocas. Pero es la modernidad que se abre paso en los sesenta, coincidiendo con la eclosion de las nuevas olas europeas, lo que remueve esta relacion y proclama el deseo de un acceso directo al mundo frente a la relacion artificiosa del espectaculo. La revolucion del directo, con los nuevos equipos electronicos mas ligeros, da lugar a una reivindicacion de la verdad como discurso mediatico frente a la mera verosimilitud de la ficcion. El auge del documentalismo no radica solo en el eje Canada-Francia-EE.UU., sino que buena parte del cine moderno de los anos sesenta se situa en la tranversalidad del eje ficcion/ documental. El cine de Godard, en este sentido, actualiza estas dos dimensiones cinematograficas contemporaneas, ya que para el director frances un cineasta era, en cierta forma y siempre, un reportero de la actualidad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".