Las transformaciones nacional de la identidad y la cuestión de la territorialidad en perspectiva comparada. Los casos de Québec y el País Vasco
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The centrality of the question of territoriality for the discussion about selfdetermination in nationalistic movements makes it specially appropriate to adopt a comparative perspective. This will allow us to show the similarities and the particularities among different cases studies. This paper compares Basque and «Québécois» nationalism by focusing on the role that territoriality plays in national identity. Firstly, it is argued that ethnic and civic concepts are unsuitable for classifying these nationalisms. This paper continues by showing the relevance and potentialities of comparing the Basque and «Québécois» cases. In particular we compare the representation of the national territory in each case, as well as its role for the national identity. Other questions are compared, e.g., the linkage between territory and others diacritic features, or the linkage between territorial integrity and sovereignty, Finally, the paper points out the «political role» that nationalism warrants to the territory in order to fulfil the political agenda of sovereignty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".