MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1945472287 · doi:10.3917/soc.109.0041

Le mythe de Venise

2010· article· fr· W1945472287 on OpenAlex
Amina Yagoubi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociétés · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQ
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Venise n’est pas modernité, car l’idée de la modernité est liée à celle du tourisme, du stéréotype. Il faut dès lors penser Venise en termes de post-modernité si cela est possible en investissant l’idée d’une cité culturelle avec des activités de recherche… La perte de la mémoire concerne toutes les grandes villes, le monde entier. Qui connaît Paris désormais ? Pas même l’habitant ! Nous ne sommes d’ailleurs plus des habitants mais des résidents mobiles. Venise est un mythe particulier, très lourd, pesant pour la possibilité d’innover. Le mythe essentiellement romantique de Venise lié au tourisme tue toute possibilité d’innovation et fige par conséquent, Venise. La cité européenne méditerranéenne, organique, puise sa force dans sa capacité constructive, technique. Venise est pierre ! Rien n’est naturel à Venise, tout est « ars », « tekhnê » 1 …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it